<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FX-Bandit Drawdown, Steinitz Active</title>
	<link>http://forexkungfu.com/2007/11/15/fx-bandit-drawdown-steinitz-active/</link>
	<description>Because History Repeats Itself</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ck</title>
		<link>http://forexkungfu.com/2007/11/15/fx-bandit-drawdown-steinitz-active/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 06:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://forexkungfu.com/2007/11/15/fx-bandit-drawdown-steinitz-active/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>keep the updates coming mate :O)

with regards to Bill's advise to disable the stop-loss, i think it needs to be looked at very carefully.  there are 2 schools of thought with regards to trading with stops.... and i would say that Bill is on the extreme end of the school that does not advocate a good and tight stop-loss.  this, of course, is just my personal opinion. - ck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keep the updates coming mate :O)</p>
<p>with regards to Bill&#8217;s advise to disable the stop-loss, i think it needs to be looked at very carefully.  there are 2 schools of thought with regards to trading with stops&#8230;. and i would say that Bill is on the extreme end of the school that does not advocate a good and tight stop-loss.  this, of course, is just my personal opinion. - ck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
